SEPPS - Revision history

Astrid: /* Meta-Data {{#simple-tooltip-info: [meta_data_study] }} */

2018-06-28T12:32:55Z

‎Meta-Data {{#simple-tooltip-info: [meta_data_study] }}

Astrid: /* Meta-Data [meta_data_study] */

2018-06-28T12:32:37Z

‎Meta-Data [meta_data_study]

Astrid: /* Data Collection Rounds [= waves] */

2018-06-28T12:31:13Z

‎Data Collection Rounds [= waves]

Astrid at 12:53, 14 June 2018

2018-06-14T12:53:22Z

Astrid: /* Meta-Data [meta_data_study] */

2018-06-14T12:51:28Z

‎Meta-Data [meta_data_study]

Astrid at 09:43, 6 March 2018

2018-03-06T09:43:12Z

Astrid at 15:05, 28 February 2018

2018-02-28T15:05:44Z

Astrid at 14:31, 26 February 2018

2018-02-26T14:31:14Z

Astrid: Protected "SEPPS" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

2018-02-26T14:27:51Z

Protected "SEPPS" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

Astrid: Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey}} == Description == The Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey is a longitudinal online study conducted b..."

2018-02-26T14:27:38Z

Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey}} == Description == The Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey is a longitudinal online study conducted b..."

New page

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey}}
== Description ==
The Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey is a longitudinal online study conducted by Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach among doctoral candidates and postdoctoral researchers at tier-1 U.S. research institutions. The sampling frame was obtained based National Science Foundation’s reports on earned doctorates (2008). The study focusses on 39 U.S. research universities with large doctoral programs in science and engineering fields. The contact list was developed by hand-collecting names and email addresses from listings provided on departments’ websites (Sauermann & Roach, 2012b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012b). Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. ''Research Policy 42(1)'', 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003</ref>). The final sample used for this study includes 24,651 individuals, covering 9 broad science and engineering fields.

== Data Collection Rounds [= waves] ==
A list of the universities and sample size is available [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036307 here].

== Results ==
Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach have authored a number of publications based on their study (Roach & Sauermann, 2010<ref name="roach_sauermann_2010">Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists' academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. ''Research Policy, 39(3)'', 422–434. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77-4YC39KR-1/2/38bf93e1d30c80b0f9d251010c479a37</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2011a<ref name="sauermann_roach_2011a">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2011a). Not All Scientists Pay to Be Scientists: Heterogeneous Preferences for Publishing in Industrial Research. ''Research Policy 43(1)'', 32-47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1696783</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2011b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2011b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2011b). The Price of Silence: Scientists' Trade-offs Between Publishing and Pay. Georgia Institute of Technology.</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2012<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012">Sauermann, H. & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. ''PloS ONE 7(5)'', e36307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307</ref>; Sauermann, Roach, & Nunes, 2012<ref name="sauermann_roach_nunes_2012">Sauermann, H., Roach, M., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2012). Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. ''PLoS ONE, 7(5)'', e36307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2016<ref name="sauermann_roach_2016">Sauermann, H. & Roach, M. (2016). Why pursue the postdoc path? ''Science 352(6286)'', 663-664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2061</ref>; Roach & Sauermann, 2017<ref name="roach_sauermann_2017">Roach, M. & Sauermann, H. (2017). The declining interest in an academic career. ''PLoS ONE 12(9)'', e0184130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184130</ref>).

== Sources ==
<references/>

[[Category:Studies]]

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 |Publisher||-
 |- style="vertical-align:top"
-|Keywords {{#simple-tooltip-info: property: study country }}||[[study keyword::Occupational Preferences| ]][[Occupational_preferences|Occupational Preferences]]
+|Keywords {{#simple-tooltip-info: property: study keyword }}||[[study keyword::Occupational Preferences| ]][[Occupational_preferences|Occupational Preferences]]
 |-
 |}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey is a longitudinal online study conducted by Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach among doctoral candidates and postdoctoral researchers at tier-1 U.S. research institutions. The sampling frame was obtained based National Science Foundation’s reports on earned doctorates (2008). The study focusses on 39 U.S. research universities with large doctoral programs in science and engineering fields. The contact list was developed by hand-collecting names and email addresses from listings provided on departments’ websites (Sauermann & Roach, 2012b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012b). Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. ''Research Policy 42(1)'', 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003</ref>). The final sample used for this study includes 24,651 individuals, covering 9 broad science and engineering fields.
-== Meta-Data [meta_data_study] ==
+== Meta-Data {{#simple-tooltip-info: [meta_data_study] }} ==
 {| class="wikitable"
 |- style="vertical-align:top"
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 |- style="vertical-align:top"
 |Duration||2010, 2013
 |- style="vertical-align:top"
 |URL||
@@ Line 32: / Line 34: @@
 |Publisher||-
 |- style="vertical-align:top"
-|Keywords||[[Occupational_preferences|Occupational Preferences]]
+|Keywords {{#simple-tooltip-info: property: study country }}||[[study keyword::Occupational Preferences| ]][[Occupational_preferences|Occupational Preferences]]
 |-
 |}

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 == Results ==
-Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach have authored a number of publications based on their study (Roach & Sauermann, 2010<ref name="roach_sauermann_2010">Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists' academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. ''Research Policy, 39(3)'', 422–434. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77-4YC39KR-1/2/38bf93e1d30c80b0f9d251010c479a37</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2011a<ref name="sauermann_roach_2011a">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2011a). Not All Scientists Pay to Be Scientists: Heterogeneous Preferences for Publishing in Industrial Research. ''Research Policy 43(1)'', 32-47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1696783</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2011b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2011b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2011b). The Price of Silence: Scientists' Trade-offs Between Publishing and Pay. Georgia Institute of Technology.</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2012<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012">Sauermann, H. & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. ''PloS ONE 7(5)'', e36307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307</ref>; Sauermann, Roach, & Nunes, 2012<ref name="sauermann_roach_nunes_2012">Sauermann, H., Roach, M., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2012). Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. ''PLoS ONE, 7(5)'', e36307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2016<ref name="sauermann_roach_2016">Sauermann, H. & Roach, M. (2016). Why pursue the postdoc path? ''Science 352(6286)'', 663-664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2061</ref>; Roach & Sauermann, 2017<ref name="roach_sauermann_2017">Roach, M. & Sauermann, H. (2017). The declining interest in an academic career. ''PLoS ONE 12(9)'', e0184130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184130</ref>).
+Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach have authored a number of publications based on their study (Roach & Sauermann, 2010<ref name="roach_sauermann_2010">Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists' academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. ''Research Policy, 39(3)'', 422–434. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77-4YC39KR-1/2/38bf93e1d30c80b0f9d251010c479a37</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2011a<ref name="sauermann_roach_2011a">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2011a). Not All Scientists Pay to Be Scientists: Heterogeneous Preferences for Publishing in Industrial Research. ''Research Policy 43(1)'', 32-47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1696783</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2011b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2011b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2011b). The Price of Silence: Scientists' Trade-offs Between Publishing and Pay. Georgia Institute of Technology.</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2012<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012">Sauermann, H. & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. ''PloS ONE 7(5)'', e36307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307</ref>; Sauermann & Roach, 2016<ref name="sauermann_roach_2016">Sauermann, H. & Roach, M. (2016). Why pursue the postdoc path? ''Science 352(6286)'', 663-664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2061</ref>; Roach & Sauermann, 2017<ref name="roach_sauermann_2017">Roach, M. & Sauermann, H. (2017). The declining interest in an academic career. ''PLoS ONE 12(9)'', e0184130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184130</ref>).
 == Sources ==
@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 [[Category:sauermann_roach_2012b]]
 [[Category:sauermann_roach_2016]]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 |Publisher||-
 |- style="vertical-align:top"
-|Keywords||Occupational Preferences
+|Keywords||[[Occupational_preferences|Occupational Preferences]]
 |-
 |}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 26 February 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Description ==		== Description ==
	The Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey is a longitudinal online study conducted by Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach among doctoral candidates and postdoctoral researchers at tier-1 U.S. research institutions. The sampling frame was obtained based National Science Foundation’s reports on earned doctorates (2008). The study focusses on 39 U.S. research universities with large doctoral programs in science and engineering fields. The contact list was developed by hand-collecting names and email addresses from listings provided on departments’ websites (Sauermann & Roach, 2012b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012b). Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. ''Research Policy 42(1)'', 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003</ref>). The final sample used for this study includes 24,651 individuals, covering 9 broad science and engineering fields.		The Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey is a longitudinal online study conducted by Henry Sauermann and Michael Roach among doctoral candidates and postdoctoral researchers at tier-1 U.S. research institutions. The sampling frame was obtained based National Science Foundation’s reports on earned doctorates (2008). The study focusses on 39 U.S. research universities with large doctoral programs in science and engineering fields. The contact list was developed by hand-collecting names and email addresses from listings provided on departments’ websites (Sauermann & Roach, 2012b<ref name="sauermann_roach_2012b">Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012b). Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. ''Research Policy 42(1)'', 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003</ref>). The final sample used for this study includes 24,651 individuals, covering 9 broad science and engineering fields.
		+
		+
		+	== Meta-Data [meta_data_study] ==
		+	{\| class="wikitable"
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Study Title (long)\|\|Science and Engineering PhD and PostDoc Survey
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Study Title (short)\|\|SEPPS
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Coordinating Institution\|\|Cornell University<br>Georgia Institute of Technology
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Creator\|\|Henry Sauermann<br>Michael Roach
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Contributor\|\|-
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Sponsor\|\|NSF
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Type\|\|Panel Survey
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Description of Observations\|\|Doctoral candidates and postdoctoral researchers at tier-1 U.S. research institutions
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Waves\|\|2
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Duration\|\|2010, 2013
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|URL\|\|
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Documentation\|\|-
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Publisher\|\|-
		+	\|- style="vertical-align:top"
		+	\|Keywords\|\|Occupational Preferences
		+	\|-
		+	\|}

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 |}
-== Data Collection Rounds [= waves] ==
+== Data Collection Rounds {{#simple-tooltip-info: [waves] }} ==
 A list of the universities and sample size is available [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036307 here].

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 == Sources ==
 <references/>
 [[Category:Studies]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:27, 26 February 2018
(No difference)