Difference between revisions of "Individual Goals"

From Research Career Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Individual Goals" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading])
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Main ==
 
== Main ==
Individual goals have a motivational quality, meaning the desire to achieve a specific outcome. Moreover, goals have a volitional quality meaning the will and the commitment for certain activities or results. Among others, occupational learning-, career goals as well as goals in private life can be distinguished (Abele, 2002). Individual Goals play an important role in Social Cognitive Career Theory.
+
Individual goals have a motivational quality, meaning the desire to achieve a specific outcome. Moreover, goals have a volitional quality meaning the will and the commitment for certain activities or results. Among others, occupational learning-, career goals as well as goals in private life can be distinguished (Abele, 2002<ref name="abele_2002">Abele, A. E. (2002). Ein Modell und empirische Befunde zur beruflichen Laufbahnentwicklung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Geschlechtsvergleichs. Psychologische Rundschau 53(3), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1026//0033-3042.53.3.109</ref>). Individual Goals play an important role in [[Social Cognitive Career Theory|Social Cognitive Career Theory]].
 +
 
 +
=== Sources ===

Revision as of 16:48, 22 February 2018

Main

Individual goals have a motivational quality, meaning the desire to achieve a specific outcome. Moreover, goals have a volitional quality meaning the will and the commitment for certain activities or results. Among others, occupational learning-, career goals as well as goals in private life can be distinguished (Abele, 2002[1]). Individual Goals play an important role in Social Cognitive Career Theory.

Sources

  1. Abele, A. E. (2002). Ein Modell und empirische Befunde zur beruflichen Laufbahnentwicklung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Geschlechtsvergleichs. Psychologische Rundschau 53(3), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1026//0033-3042.53.3.109